Well, I’m sure Picard’s bacteria won’t out compete the fundamental building blocks of life forever altering the course of history or anything…

Technically a terminal is a physical crt or phosphate or whatever old kind of monitor they had back then, the dot matrix printer was a tty or teletype system, the terminal emulator is emulating the the old dumb analog monitor on top of the digital os not necessarily the tty although the terminal was doing the same function as the tty, so a raw terminal would be graphical… I guess we are going so far back the words are losing meaning but the terminal emulator which runs on top of the GUI classifies as part of the GUI as much as notepad or word

This is a legal move, it’s called a forfeit you knock over your own king and you lose, you don’t normally need the pawn but if you’re forfeiting anyway I don’t think it matters.

If we want to be technical even the terminal itself is a GUI just not a very interactive one, technically anything(most things) outside of the grub loader, bios and drives are part of the gui, I will concede that that is not a very useful definition but when dealing with edge cases like terminal emulators you would have to say it is indeed part of the gui at least technically.

Not entirely accurate since the majority of Linux system settings are in fact GUI settings, you forget the Linux under the hood is all pure text based meaning it’s just GUI settings and worse GUI settings.

He’s Donald Ducking his balls?