Well obviously - me as well - but I’m being told by extremists here that any support for a Trump supporter makes me a Nazi, and I don’t want to be one of those.

Now here’s the scrubber of this all – If you REALLY want to be serious – Go to a farmers market.

Oh wait, almost every fucking farmer is a Trump supporter…

Separate the Art from the Artist is accepted by SANE people, who don’t have time to milk tirades so that they can play victim on the internet so that strangers think they are virtuous.

There is not a thing you do, have, own, buy, or operate that isn’t part of slavery, human exploitation, etc in some way or another. You only do this because you want to virtue signal to others that you think “good thoughts” and so you can be praised for being brave.

You’re not brave. You don’t make a difference. And nobody cares.

If you eat any kind of meat, your an evil “carnist”. If you don’t adopt pets from the shelter, then you’re contributing to pet farming. If you don’t drink from a paper straw then you’re killing turtles.

Everyone everywhere has some problem with someone’s something. You literally cannot avoid it all. Own a smartphone? Then you’re evil and deserve to die because you’re carrying an item that was made by slavery! Let me guess…you’re not gonna give up the smartphone…are you? Yeah - I didn’t think you would.

You literally cannot escape these companies, they own everything. Every brand of every everything, and you’ve got a large corporation in there somewhere in the shadows. That’s why they tell you to separate the art from the artist, because it’s been made impossible to boycott anything.

I wonder if they tried to pay it with a signed note by their mother and a chuck-e-cheeze token with ‘payment in full’ scribbled across the note in red marker.

Everyone who bought a 5080 and 5090, deserves this.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

I’m pretty sure our election systems have already been compromised, so this is just the start.

I have read the paper, how about not immediately jumping to the condescending, patronizing tone?

Also, you didn’t answer the question. It simply says “users with access to GenAI tools”. You’ve added your own qualifications separate from the question at hand.

It was already known that “users with access to GenAI tools produce a less diverse set of outcomes for the same task.”

Why is this portrayed as a bad thing? Correct answers are correct answers. The only thing LLMs typically are bad at, are things that are seldom discussed or have some ambiguity behind them. So long as users understand the limitations of AI and understand when and where to trust them - then why is their diversity in output a bad thing?

Regularly we seek uniformity in output in order to better handle its output in tasks further down. I don’t see this as a bad thing at all.

The architecture doesn’t determine the power draw so much as the system design. I’ve got a Chromebox running an i3 and sipping 4.5w at idle.

Why in hell are all these people on a Technology community who clearly don’t understand the reason why companies are all-in on the AI thing?

I don’t want to pull a “no true scotsman” here, but holy christ. Are any of the people here actually technology enthusiasts? Because there’s a lot of technophobes and luddites here.

In fact, I’d say MOST replies to this community are people pooh-poohing Tech.