• 0 Posts
  • 3 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 4th, 2023

help-circle
  • kava@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.worldGulf of Make a Report to Apple
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    42 minutes ago

    What difference does this make? Some lower level employee will see this, roll his eyes, and then continue on with his day.

    Beyond this, do you think Apple can actually take any other position than aligning with fascism? That was always going to happen. They literally can’t help but align with fascism- this is the culmination of late stage capitalism.

    It’s like politely asking a dog not to salivate when it sees a steak in front of it.

    You’re not gonna get anywhere and you’re just wasting time.

    Also on a side note- you should switch to Linux because you should take charge of your own hardware and learn how it works before it’s taken away from you. You should do it for open source and for freedom. Not threaten to do something because a company is doing company things.


  • Corporations, at their core, are profit-generating engines—nothing more, nothing less. The corporate board’s one legal imperative is to ensure the shareholders see a return on their investment, by any means necessary. Morality? A marketing gimmick when convenient- not an operating principle.

    All companies are evil. Google is not any more or less evil than any other company. The difference is they have a significant power base and therefore have a lot to gain or lose in the transition to fascism. They understand that Trump is spiteful and willing to bend and even break the law to punish those who defy him. They also understand he rewards those who bend the knee. Therefore, the most profitable path of action is bending the knee.

    This should not surprise anybody. You substitute Google for any large corporation and they would have done the same thing. Don’t believe me? Google around (while you still can freely search for information) for the Coca-Cola saga in Colombia, where union leaders were getting forcibly suicided by narco-paramilitary death squads hired by Coca-Cola.

    You know- the commercials that make you feel all warm and fuzzy around Christmas time with the polar bears and Santa Claus? Yeah, they’ll murder you if you threaten their bottom line. It’s just what they do.

    There’s a simple math equation:

    Let

    P = Probability of getting caught,

    F = Expected fine or penalty,

    R = Potential revenue or profit,

    Constants

    α = The weight assigned to the probability of getting caught ( P ). If this constant is high, the corporation is more cautious… if it’s low, the corporation is willing to make more risks. In Colombia, this is much lower than in the US.

    β = The weight assigned to the probable size of the penalty ( F ). A high β means there’s a serious potential danger. However, if β is low (like when Ford decided the cost of simply paying lawsuits from deaths due to known car malfunctions was probably lower than the price of recalls) then they’ll be more likely to push forward

    γ = The weight assigned to the impact on their bottom line ( R ). For example, if Boeing thinks they will lose a lot of money from whistleblowers, they will find a way to suicide them. If the impact is small, then it’s not worth the potential risks.

    C = ( αP ⋅ βF ) − γR

    Let’s give an imaginary example. Let’s say a corporation is considering dumping toxic waste illegally into a river, potentially giving thousands of people cancer. Let’s say they’re gonna save $10M a year from doing this.

    R = 10,000,000

    The probability of getting caught is 10%

    P = 0.10

    The expected fine is $5M

    F = 5,00,000

    Let’s try out some constants

    α = 1.5 ⇒ they’re somewhat cautious about getting caught

    β = 1.2 ⇒ they’re moderately concerned about the penalty

    γ = 2.0 ⇒ they’re really motivated by profit (maybe their profits went down 10% last year, a big no-no)

    Plug in the values

    C = (1.5 · 0.10 · 1.2 · 5,000,000) - (2.0 · 10,000,000)

    C = (900,000) - (20,000,000)

    C = -19,100,000

    C is less than 0? Dump that toxic waste, baby. It’s the logical position if you’re trying to maximize profit. Sometimes you will get caught, but imagine you did this in a simulation 1,000 times. Most of the times, you will be more profitable because of it and therefore you dump the waste.

    It’s like a poker player. If you get AA, you raise pre-flop. Sometimes you will lose on the flop to some dunce who goes in with 2-7… but in the long term, most of the time, you will win. Therefore it’s the right move.

    This is what companies do. People need to realize and internalize this. They are profit generating engines. Nothing more, nothing less. They are not your friends. They don’t care about the environment. They don’t care about the future of the world or anything. Literally nothing at all.

    They are a math formula and if destroying everything you love happens to be the most profitable move most of the time, they will do it without second guessing. Because they aren’t people. They are a machine.


  • when the data used to train the AI is copyrighted, how do you make it open source? it’s a valid question.

    one thing is the model or the code that trains the AI. the other thing is the data that produces the weights which determines how the model predicts

    of course, the obligatory fuck meta and the zuck and all that but there is a legal conundrum here we need to address that don’t fit into our current IP legal framework

    my preferred solution is just to eliminate IP entirely