What? No. Instead we would be able to see steady increases of say 10 % per year as a straight line instead of this, where it appears to be ever larger increases and the first ones essentially invisible.

How could I blindly trust anything in this context?

But that would take far more cops to actually know people? Like in the order of one per 100? There are currently 700’000 cops, that would be 5x as many. How many people could one cop realistically know? What problem would this “knowing people” actually solve?

Why is the graph not logarithmic? Urgh

Small local police can not deal with everything tho. There is a reason for multiple “layers”. The problem arise when anyone can be police, dealing with people’s lives without any meaningful training or selection, while other professions need years of training and certificates before they are allowed to do far less consequential things.

Ahahahahahhaha what?

TIG? Holy cow yes please, let’s stack some dimes!

This is really a non-issue, as the LLM itself should have no problem at setting a reasonable value itself. User wants a summary? Obviously maximum factual. He wants gaming ideas? Etc.

Rare that people here argument for LLMs like that here, usually it is the same kind of “uga suga, AI bad, did not already solve world hunger”.

Especially after the open source release of DeepSeak… What…?

Nonsense, I use it a ton for science and engineering, it saves me SO much time!