• bss03@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Apophis missed the keyhole, so no chance of impact this century, sorry. It would be a much bigger event, too, about 10-30 times the energy.

    But, this noise does remind me of 2004.

    • Singletona082@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Huh didn’t think the keyhole event was til 2028 swingby. Neat. Wonder if Esa or Jacsa can get probes up in time for its next approach.

      • bss03@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Yeah, I misspoke. I meant “will miss”, we’ve got enough observations that we know the “keyhole event” that was a possibility is no longer a possibility.

        • Singletona082@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Fair. All jokes and nihilism aside. Someone should take advantage of the flyby to send something up to study it.

          • bss03@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            I think it’s hard to justify since we’ve already done a successful asteroid rendezvous (a few, IIRC) and it’s unclear (to me) what we could learn from studying the surface of this particular one or even studying from the surface of this one.

            If we knew how to move it from solar orbit to terrestrial or lunar orbit and then use it as raw materials, that might be profitable. Or at least a nice engineering challenge on the way to profitable asteroid mining. But, I think the delta-V we’d have to achieve for that might me more than we are capable of right now.

            I do wonder if we could put something on it and use it as part of a measurement tool, like how they can stitch together multiple 'scope sensors? I forget what the name of that is. Differential capture? Diffusion imaging?

            It is an interesting opportunity, we rarely get such close flybys well predicted, but someone closer to the science / smarter than me would have to put together a mission plan.